QA Check Thread poster: Rad Graban (X)
|
|---|
Rad Graban (X) 
United Kingdom
Local time: 07:03
Ingiriisi to Slovak
+ ...
Hi all,
Purely just to share this experience.
I have been approached today with a job for QA check. 250 words at a fixed price of £6.50.
As if that wasn't bad enough, I was asked to send back three documents: 2 word docs (one with track changes and one with abbreviations) and the completed QA.
By abbreviations they mean WT (Wrong Term), WS (Wrong Sentence), SE (Syntax Error), etc. inserted wherever I make a correction. QA is an Excell sheet where you nee... See more Hi all,
Purely just to share this experience.
I have been approached today with a job for QA check. 250 words at a fixed price of £6.50.
As if that wasn't bad enough, I was asked to send back three documents: 2 word docs (one with track changes and one with abbreviations) and the completed QA.
By abbreviations they mean WT (Wrong Term), WS (Wrong Sentence), SE (Syntax Error), etc. inserted wherever I make a correction. QA is an Excell sheet where you need to enter number of each of the mistakes and whether you classify them as minor, major or critical.
Don't you think this kind of job/service should be valued a little more?
:~))) ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Certainly, it is a lot of work to achieve in 7 to 8 minutes | Jul 1, 2009 |
EUR 6.50 only covers (or should cover) about 7 to 8 minutes of a translator's time. In addition, even if the work is achievable in this time, this amount does not really include either the ink or the paper to print off the 3 documents, nor does it cover the cost of storing those papers, as well as the correspondence and invoice, for 6 years (documents) and 10 years (invoice), as required by the tax office.
It is therefore not a case of valuing or not valuing the service provided. If... See more EUR 6.50 only covers (or should cover) about 7 to 8 minutes of a translator's time. In addition, even if the work is achievable in this time, this amount does not really include either the ink or the paper to print off the 3 documents, nor does it cover the cost of storing those papers, as well as the correspondence and invoice, for 6 years (documents) and 10 years (invoice), as required by the tax office.
It is therefore not a case of valuing or not valuing the service provided. If you do not charge a minimum fee - or the agency does not agree to pay you a minimum fee - you will make a loss. We are, however, not in business in order to make a loss. ▲ Collapse
| | | | | "inserted wherever I make a correction" | Jul 1, 2009 |
Rad Graban wrote:
Hi all,
Purely just to share this experience.
I have been approached today with a job for QA check. 250 words at a fixed price of £6.50.
As if that wasn't bad enough, I was asked to send back three documents: 2 word docs (one with track changes and one with abbreviations) and the completed QA.
By abbreviations they mean WT (Wrong Term), WS (Wrong Sentence), SE (Syntax Error), etc. inserted wherever I make a correction. QA is an Excell sheet where you need to enter number of each of the mistakes and whether you classify them as minor, major or critical.
Don't you think this kind of job/service should be valued a little more?
:~)))
If the translation was crowdsourced, that would be a full translation anyway.
| | | | Samuel Murray
Netherlands
Local time: 08:03
Member (2006)
Ingiriisi to Afrikaans
+ ...
| Not enough pay | Jul 1, 2009 |
Rad Graban wrote:
I have been approached today with a job for QA check. 250 words at a fixed price of £6.50. As if that wasn't bad enough, I was asked to send back three documents: 2 word docs (one with track changes and one with abbreviations) and the completed QA. By abbreviations they mean WT (Wrong Term), WS (Wrong Sentence), SE (Syntax Error), etc. inserted wherever I make a correction. QA is an Excell sheet where you need to enter number of each of the mistakes and whether you classify them as minor, major or critical.
GBP 6.50 covers 19 minutes of my time. Not enough to do QA of 250 words in an Excel sheet the way you describe. I would not do it for less than an hour's pay. It is also rather hard on your wrist -- all that selecting of options in Excel. I may be able to QA 250 words in 19 minutes if I only need to use Track Changes and/or add inline comments in MS Word, but even then it must be a pretty good translation.
| | |
|
|
|
Rad Graban (X)
United Kingdom
Local time: 07:03
Ingiriisi to Slovak
+ ...
TOPIC STARTER | That's what I mean | Jul 1, 2009 |
Samuel Murray wrote:
GBP 6.50 covers 19 minutes of my time. Not enough to do QA of 250 words in an Excel sheet the way you describe. I would not do it for less than an hour's pay. It is also rather hard on your wrist -- all that selecting of options in Excel. I may be able to QA 250 words in 19 minutes if I only need to use Track Changes and/or add inline comments in MS Word, but even then it must be a pretty good translation.
First, you have to do proofreading with "Track Changes". Then, to do another 'proofreading' seperately, to insert abbreviations indicating type of mistake. And then, to complete a table in Excel to classify types of mistakes.
I don't know, but I would estimate this whole process (with just 250 words) would take well over an hour.
[Edited at 2009-07-01 21:40 GMT]
| | | | | Wrong rate, and... | Jul 2, 2009 |
Beside the fact that the rate is extremely low considering the task and its duration, I just can't understand why they are making such a mess out of this. The good thing is that if they are making such a mess, that means they care about quality. I'd rather work with such people (provided I get paid a fair rate for it). I would charge my minimum rate for this in any case...
Haven't these people heard of ApSic Comparator? It would provide the same result, but it would be much faster, ... See more Beside the fact that the rate is extremely low considering the task and its duration, I just can't understand why they are making such a mess out of this. The good thing is that if they are making such a mess, that means they care about quality. I'd rather work with such people (provided I get paid a fair rate for it). I would charge my minimum rate for this in any case...
Haven't these people heard of ApSic Comparator? It would provide the same result, but it would be much faster, easier and more foolproof. You would edit the bilingual document directly and then create a comparison report (which only shows segments that have changes and highlights those changes - takes only a few seconds). There is a column in there to add codes, and you can add as many columns as you like to suit the project's needs.
And there are other tools and methods available that would make things much easier for everybody. Why all this torture?
[Edited at 2009-07-02 19:15 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » QA Check | Pastey | Your smart companion app
Pastey is an innovative desktop application that bridges the gap between human expertise and artificial intelligence. With intuitive keyboard shortcuts, Pastey transforms your source text into AI-powered draft translations.
Find out more » |
| | TM-Town | Manage your TMs and Terms ... and boost your translation business
Are you ready for something fresh in the industry? TM-Town is a unique new site for you -- the freelance translator -- to store, manage and share translation memories (TMs) and glossaries...and potentially meet new clients on the basis of your prior work.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
Translation news
